Use ERAS as the PICOT
Rubric Introduction
Introduction missing many important aspects of the definition and descriptions of the topic. No definition or description is present = 0 points
0 points
Introduction missing some important aspects of the definition and descriptions of the topic. Minimal definition or description is present
6 points
Introduction is missing one important aspect of the definition and description of the topic
8 points
One page in length. Identify area of clinical interest based on professional expertise. Discuss PICO and frame clinical question.
10 points
Description of the practice problem & statistical relevancy
Does not elaborate on the statistical relevancy of the issue.
0 points
Elaborate on minimal statistical relevancy of the issue.
10 points
Some mentions of the statistical relevancy present but superficial.
19 points
Clearly identify the statistical relevance of the problem, including the demographic affected by the issue, the cost related with the issue, etc.
25 points
Annotated Bibliography
Either included only one or two professional resource; or scholarly references did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of original research articles that did not relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was overall not adequate
0 points
Included minimal professional resource; or scholarly references did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of original research articles that did not relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was overall not adequate
10 points
Either Included less than 5 professional resources or resources did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of 5 original research articles that did not clearly relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was conducted but clarity was lacking is some aspects
13 points
Clearly and succinctly synthesize the literature related to the identified clinical problem in an annotated bibliography format (see example). Provide a summary of a minimum of 5 scholarly references in the annotated bibliography including at least one peer-reviewed regarding the proposed approaches to the identified clinical problem; includes one paragraph that briefly summarizes the reference, a second paragraph about the strengths and weaknesses of the reference, and a third paragraph about the potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project. Each entry should include: a. The citation of the reference in APA format (this is your level 2 heading for each entry) b. A brief summary of the reference related to the identified clinical problem and PICOT question c. Any statistical component found (sample size, cost, number of people affected, etc.) d. Strengths and weaknesses of the reference e. Potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project
17 points
References Page
Less than 4 resources correctly referenced.
0 points
Less than 5 resources correctly referenced.
3 points
A minimum of 6 resources correctly referenced.
4 points
All resources correctly referenced
5 points
APA format
APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing.
0 points
APA formatting contains some errors and/or several citations are missing.
5 points
3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1-2 citations are missing.
8 points
APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors.
10 points
DNP 7200 Statistics for the Health and Biological Sciences
Purpose
The purpose of the assignment is to allow you to further explore the practice problem that you have chosen for potential use in your final DNP by exploring the statistical component of your practice problem. You will also build an annotated bibliography and grade your evidences by building a Graded table of evidences.
Each student will:
1. Use your previously conducted focused review of literature related to the identified clinical problem from the course DNP7100 Evaluation of Evidence for Practice.
2. Describe the problem, the significance of the problem using professional references.
3. Describe the statistical relevancy of your problem (how many people affected, the cost, percentages, etc.)
4. State the practice question in PICOT format. (You can use the revised one from the previous course DNP7100).
5. Clearly and succinctly synthesize the literature related to the identified clinical problem in an annotated bibliography format (see example). Provide a summary of 5 scholarly references in the annotated bibliography including at least one peer-reviewed, and one scholarly reference from at least 3 different levels of evidence regarding the proposed approaches to the identified clinical problem.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcome:
· Assimilate principles of epidemiology with scientific data necessary for epidemiologic intervention and draw appropriate inferences from epidemiologic data.
· Summarize scientific knowledge to determine the nature and significance of a clinical problem at the microsystem level.
· Analyze the application of biostatistics in the role of Doctor of Nursing practice.
· Interpret the role of biostatistics in study design, sample selection, hypothesis testing, and evaluation of research.
· Articulate how to select samples, determine reliability, and assess validity of research data. Evaluate sources, methods, and designs for data collection, management, and analysis.
Program Outcomes
· I-Integrate Scientific Underpinnings into Practice
· III-Apply Clinical Scholarship and Analytical Methods for Evidence-Based Practice
· VIII-Demonstrate advanced levels of clinical judgment, systems thinking, and accountability in designing, delivering, and evaluating evidence-based care to improve patient outcome
Leadership Role-Specific Competencies
· Demonstrate effective communication and relationship building:
· Through the production of written materials
· Through collaborative relationships with DNP stakeholders
· Through engagement of stakeholders
· Demonstrate knowledge of the healthcare environment
· Demonstrating current knowledge of patient care delivery systems across the continuum
· Demonstrating understanding of the regulation and payment issues that affect an organization’s finance
· Articulating the organization’s performance improvement program and goals
· Demonstrate Leadership Skills
· Demonstrating applied critical analysis to organizational issues after a review of the evidence
· Demonstrate Professionalism
· Seeking input and mentorship from other in career planning and development
Due Date
Submit to Moodle by Saturday of Week #6 at 11:59 p.m. ET.
Requirements
a. An introduction and brief discussion of the PICOT and clinical question. (You can use the revised one from the previous course DNP7100).
b. A description of the practice problem including impact on patient/client and family, healthcare system, or society and the statistical impact. (You can use some of the same information from a previous assignment from the DNP 7100).
c. Describe the statistical relevancy of your problem (how many people affected, the cost, percentages, etc.).
d. Clearly and succinctly synthesize the literature related to the identified clinical problem in an annotated bibliography format (see example). Provide a summary of 5 scholarly references in the annotated bibliography including at least one peer-reviewed regarding the proposed approaches to the identified clinical problem; includes one paragraph that briefly summarizes the reference, a second paragraph about the strengths and weaknesses of the reference, and a third paragraph about the potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project.
Each entry should include:
a. The citation of the reference in APA format (this is your level 2 heading for each entry)
b. A brief summary of the reference related to the identified clinical problem and PICOT question
c. Any statistical component found (sample size, cost, number of people affected, etc.)
d. Strengths and weaknesses of the reference
e. Potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project
*** Please discuss the findings from your assignment to you DNP Mentor and with the DNP Practice Project Thesis Proposal Mentor. ***
Directions and Grading Criteria
|
Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
|
Introduction |
10 |
10 |
Identify area of clinical interest based on professional expertise. Discuss PICOT and frame clinical question. |
|
Description of the practice problem. |
25 |
25 |
A description of the practice problem including impact on patient/client and family, healthcare system, or society and the statistical impact. (You can use some of the same information from a previous assignment from the DNP 7100). |
|
Describe the statistical relevancy |
25 |
25 |
Describe the statistical relevancy of your problem (how many people affected, the cost, percentages, etc.). |
|
Annotated Bibliography |
25 |
25 |
Clearly and succinctly synthesize the literature related to the identified clinical problem in an annotated bibliography format (see example). Provide a summary of a minimum of 5 scholarly references in the annotated bibliography including at least one peer-reviewed regarding the proposed approaches to the identified clinical problem; includes one paragraph that briefly summarizes the reference, a second paragraph about the strengths and weaknesses of the reference, and a third paragraph about the potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project. Each entry should include: a. The citation of the reference in APA format (this is your level 2 heading for each entry) b. A brief summary of the reference related to the identified clinical problem and PICOT question c. Any statistical component found (sample size, cost, number of people affected, etc.) d. Strengths and weaknesses of the reference e. Potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project |
|
References page |
5 |
5 |
All resources correctly referenced |
|
APA Format |
10 |
10 |
APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors |
|
Total: |
100 pts |
100% |
A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |
Doctor of Nursing Practice Program
DNP 7200 Statistics for the Health and Biological Sciences
Practice Problem Summary, Annotated Bibliograph y
|
DNP7200 Practice Problem/Annotated Bibliography/.docx |
1 |
Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Does Not Meet Criteria |
|
Introduction (10 pts) |
One page in length. Identify area of clinical interest based on professional expertise. Discuss PICO and frame clinical question. 7 – 10 points |
Introduction is missing one important aspect of the definition and description of the topic. 4 – 6 points |
Introduction missing many important aspects of the definition and descriptions of the topic. No definition or description is present. 0 – 3 points |
|
Description of the practice problem & statistical relevancy (25 pts) |
Clearly identify the statistical relevance of the problem, including the demographic affected by the issue, the cost related with the issue, etc. 20 – 25 points |
Some mentions of the statistical relevancy present but superficial. 10- 19 points |
Does not elaborate on the statistical relevancy of the issue. 0 – 9 points |
|
Description of statistic relevancy (25 points) |
Clearly describe the statistical relevancy of your problem (how many people affected, the cost, percentages, etc.). 20 – 25 points |
Some description of the statistical relevancy. 10-19 points |
Does not describe the statistical relevancy. 0 – 9 points |
|
Annotated Bibliography (25 points) |
Clearly and succinctly synthesize the literature related to the identified clinical problem in an annotated bibliography format (see example). Provide a summary of a minimum of 5 scholarly references in the annotated bibliography including at least one peer-reviewed regarding the proposed approaches to the identified clinical problem; includes one paragraph that briefly summarizes the reference, a second paragraph about the strengths and weaknesses of the reference, and a third paragraph about the potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project. Each entry should include: a. The citation of the reference in APA format (this is your level 2 heading for each entry) b. A brief summary of the reference related to the identified clinical problem and PICOT question c. Any statistical component found (sample size, cost, number of people affected, etc.) d. Strengths and weaknesses of the reference e. Potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project 20 – 25 points |
Either Included less than 5 professional resources or resources did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of 5 original research articles that did not clearly relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was conducted but clarity was lacking is some aspects. 10 – 19 points |
Either included only one or two professional resource; or scholarly references did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of original research articles that did not relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was overall not adequate. 0 – 7 points |
|
References Page (5 pts) |
All resources correctly referenced 5-4 points |
A minimum of 5 resources correctly referenced. 3-2 points |
Less than 5 resources correctly referenced. 1-0 points |
|
APA format (10 pts) |
APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors. 7 – 10 points |
3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1-2 citations are missing. 3 – 6 points |
APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing. 0 – 2 points |
|
Total Points Possible = 100 points |
|
DNP7200 Practice Problem/Annotated Bibliography/.docx |
3 |
