Vega Food Company

Purpose

To examine the perceptions of and the relationships between members of the family business. Use the content and models from chapters 1-5 in your analysis and recommendations. 

Vega Food Company Case Discussion Questions:
1. What are the key facts of this case?
2. What, in your opinion led Mari to sell her shares?
3. If you were Francisco, would you have called a family council meeting when he did? Why, why not?
4. To what do you attribute the improvement in family-business relationships in the last couple of years?
5. What are the major issues that Francisco and the Valle Family need to continue to address in order to ensure the survival of the business?
6. What steps should Francisco take next?
7. What should Francisco do to promote shareholder loyalty and the effective governance of the family-business relationship in the future?

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 1 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

Book Title: eTextbook: Family Business Part I. Cases Case 5. The Vega Food Company

Case 5. The Vega Food Company

In February 2007, Francisco Valle, Jr., president of Industrias La

Vega, organized the first family council meeting in the owning

family’s history to address problems he was having with his

youngest sister, Mari, a shareholder in the company. He felt that

the problems were not of his making and were interfering with

his management of the company. Francisco, 45, had worked

closely with his father, Francisco Sr., since 1986 and had become

president of the company in March 2004, when his 72-year-old

father was killed in an automobile accident. Industrias La Vega

was a Spanish meat-processing business that produced hams,

sausages, and other delicacies for domestic and export markets.

The $104.8-million-a-year business was demanding, of course,

but Francisco Jr. felt most challenged by the family conflicts that

often overwhelmed him.

The ownership structure of Industrias La Vega had been updated

just months before the tragic accident involving Francisco Sr. At

the request of Francisco Jr., who was concerned about the

possible loss of control of the enterprise he had co-managed with

his father for years, Francisco Sr. and his attorneys had created

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 2 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

two classes of stock. The voting A shares did not pay dividends.

The nonvoting but dividend-bearing B shares had a par value 10

times higher than that of the A shares.

Except for brief stints, none of the Valle daughters had worked in

the business prior to their father’s death. Ana, the second-eldest

daughter, was an artist, and she had been instrumental in

designing the image and logo of a new premium product line.

Working alongside her father, she had created the look for the

Gold Label line of meats and cold cuts. Francisco Jr. had not been

particularly enthusiastic about this new line.

Mari, 27, the youngest of the Valle siblings, was concerned about

her future and the security of her own young family after her

father’s death. She worried about how her interests as a

shareholder would be protected. She had trusted her father

completely, but she was not sure she had the same faith in

Francisco Jr. She did admit to being a little more optimistic now

that Francisco was making an effort to get closer to the lower-

level employees and be more of a leader in the company.

As it turned out, Francisco was his father’s successor not only in

the company, but also in politics. His father had won a Senate

seat in the last elections before his tragic accident. Francisco

campaigned for and won the seat, and served what would have

been his father’s term. Mari and his four other sisters chided

Francisco about being so effective in his political campaigning

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 3 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

and yet unable to instill a team spirit among the company’s

employees. He was, in fact, still spending three to four days a

week on political endeavors.

The farmers and cattle ranchers of whom Francisco Sr. had been

a lifelong customer trusted him. As a major customer for their

products, he had had much influence with them. His successful

run for the Senate at the age of 72 was evidence of the degree of

this influence, even outside business circles. In the food-

processing industry, good relations with the government

represented an asset for the Valle family, from which both

generations derived competitive advantage.

The Valle Family

The Valle family was wealthy by the standards of the small town

in which they had most of their production facilities. Francisco

Valle, Sr., was a self-made entrepreneur. He married Isabel in

1967 and had five daughters and a son (see Figure D). In 2007,

Valle family members included Isabel, 71, Francisco Sr.’s widow;

Rosa, 47; Francisco Jr., 45; Ana, 42; María, 38; Tere, 33; and Mari,

27. Of these, only Francisco Jr. and Tere worked in management

positions at the family company, and Tere had joined only three

years earlier.

86

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 4 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

Figure D Valle Family Tree

Relations between family members were warm, particularly

among the women, though several next-generation members had

created very different lives for themselves. Rosa and Maria lived

overseas but visited Isabel two or three times a year. The only

son, Francisco Jr., had studied agribusiness overseas and then

returned to run the family business.

In a traditional display of primogeniture, Francisco seemed

preordained to be the successor to his father. He took his

responsibilities toward his mother and sisters seriously, although

they all complained a little about not being involved enough, not

being kept sufficiently informed, and not being treated the same

way Francisco was treated by the company. Francisco received a

reasonable CEO salary, bonus, and benefits package. But the

sisters’ dividends were nowhere close to his take-home pay, and

Francisco, with his expensive tastes, seemed to flaunt the

Details

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 5 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

difference. A palatial home, luxury car, helicopter, boat, and

assorted other “toys” all seemed essential to Francisco in his

executive post. A couple of the sisters were divorced and had

additional financial responsibilities toward their own children.

Even Isabel lived in a more modest house and drove a less

expensive car than Francisco did.

Family members characterized themselves as being

“hermetically sealed,” meaning that they were not great

communicators. This was particularly true on the subject of

money; the few conversations about finances that took place

were one on one and had the quality of family gossip. Tere

remembers one of her sisters saying, “Is it true that you receive 1

percent of the company’s profits and Francisco gets 10 percent?

That is robbery!” Francisco was often the target of the gossip, but

mostly he ignored it, except for telling himself and his advisers,

“After all, I have been the one working the business for more

than 20 years now.”

There was plenty of evidence of love, caring, and tenderness in

the family. There was less evidence of respect for titles,

organizational structure, hard work, reporting relationships,

institutions, and formality of any kind. The family seemed ill-

equipped for financial responsibility. In the past, dividends had

been distributed infrequently. Individual family members’ needs

were brought to the attention of Francisco Sr., who usually

granted requests, as a generous father would. For Mari, the

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 6 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

youngest daughter, who grew up surrounded by evidence of the

family’s wealth, and for other siblings who needed money for

new houses or trips, asking was often akin to receiving.

Family Council Meeting, February 2007

Francisco took the initiative in sponsoring this first family

council meeting. It followed a day-long shareholders’ meeting, at

which financial information and the state of the business were

discussed with shareholders. The news for shareholders was not

great. Although company sales had continued to increase, profits

had plummeted in the past couple of years, and dividend

distributions had been cut (see Table A).

87 88

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 7 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

With Tere’s help, Francisco had interviewed and selected the

family-business adviser who facilitated the family council

meeting. The consultant had conducted a private meeting with

  2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Sales 42.5 51.7 57.4 69.4 84.1

Cost of sales 32.1 36.6 41.1 52.6 62.6

Gross margin 10.4 15.1 16.3 16.8 21.5

Administration

expenses

5.6 10.2 11.9 13.3 19.6

Interest

expenses

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Net profit 4.8 4.9 4.4 3.5 1.9

Table A Financial Results for Industrias La Vega,

2002–2009 (in millions)

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 8 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

every member of the family. A few days prior to the meeting,

Mari told the family-business consultant,

It is important that each of us know what we have, what we don’t, and what we can and cannot do as shareholders. We have to speak clearly about these things. Right now, bringing up the subject is taboo. We need more transparency in all of this. We need to recognize that we are all siblings here.

Tere observed, in her meeting with the adviser,

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 9 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

The reason for these meetings is that we need Industrias La Vega to continue as a family business. In order for that to happen, Francisco needs to be supervised. There has to be more balance between Francisco and the sisters. Those inside the company have to live by corporate rules, manage with transparency, and meet the needs of the inactive shareholders. There has been too much centralization by Francisco. Financial information about the company has to be sent out regularly and explained in such a way that all shareholders understand it. Without this education, there will be no sense of justice. But don’t get me wrong; we love each other a lot. We have grown in family unity. My mother is a very strong woman and a very steadying influence.

Isabel expressed her own expectations of the meeting this way:

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 10 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

In the interests of the family and the business, everything has to come out well defined and organized. Things have to be clear for everybody, after some discussion and reflection, so that there is no second-guessing later.

The meeting started with the setting of meeting goals and

behavioral norms for constructive problem solving and conflict

resolution. Feedback from the conversations with the family-

business consultant was provided for family members to discuss,

clarify, and then use to build an agenda that responded to the

identified needs, problems, and opportunities. Selected as the

two top-priority items on the agenda were:

Board meetings existed only on paper, and only family members

were on the board. Although a mini–family-business

presentation made by the consultant early in the meeting may

have influenced the selection of topics, both Tere and Francisco

the lack of clarity and organization in the ownership

structure, estate plan, and financial reporting

mechanisms for shareholders, and

the lack of a well-organized family forum and board of

directors.

(1)

(2)

89

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 11 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

had attended a family-business course for next-generation

members and had been convinced of the need for both of these

governance bodies. Obviously, their opinions had significant

influence in the larger shareholder group. Other topics selected

for discussion included the need to define the responsibilities of

shareholders toward the business and of managers toward

shareholders, the need to define the rules guiding relations

between members of the family acting as suppliers or

subcontractors to the company, and the third-generation

scholarship fund.

By the end of this first family council meeting, an action plan had

been drafted that directed various family members to review the

ownership structure and the possession of stock certificates,

retain a valuation expert to perform a company valuation,

review, and account for the family benefits that individual

members had been granted in order to make appropriate

decisions regarding family benefits in the next shareholder

meeting, and continue to schedule open conversations about

what shareholders wanted from the business—things such as

higher dividends, more reinvestment for long-term growth, and

liquidity of shareholdings via buy-sell agreements. An agreement

was reached among family members that the company hierarchy

would be respected, and any information required by

shareholders regarding the company and its finances would be

directed to Francisco, the president, and not to accounting

department personnel. Francisco, in return, agreed to respond to

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 12 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

such requests in a timely manner. Shareholders also reached

agreements regarding the other expectations they had of

management and what management could rightfully expect of

shareholders.

Finally, a discussion of family-business boards produced a

consensus on the desirability of a board with independent

outsiders and a list of board responsibilities. These

responsibilities were to promote the continuity of the business,

review the strategy of the business, review and approve financial

reports and budgets, review the compensation of key executives,

and provide oversight on large capital investment decisions. The

criteria for selecting board members were to be developed by a

task force made up of Francisco, Tere, and Rosa. The selection of

independent board members themselves and the holding of the

first board meeting were deemed to be the responsibilities of

Francisco, though shareholders wanted to be consulted.

Family Council Meeting, September 2007

The next family council meeting was held in September 2007.

This meeting addressed three new topics:

the family foundation (a study of its various projects in

the past five years had been done),

college scholarships for members of the third

generation, and

(1)

(2)

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 13 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

The bulk of the meeting was focused on following up on the

action plans drafted at the February meeting. While there had

been much progress on many fronts, shareholder information,

company valuation, and liquidity concerns had not been

addressed by the time this second meeting was held. And a new

board of directors or advisory board had not been assembled.

Mari Brings in the Attorneys

The semiannual family council meeting was scheduled to take

place in May 2008. Mari felt sick, and checked herself into a

hospital for observation. This precluded her from attending the

meeting. Instead, she sent two attorneys whom she and her

husband had retained to put pressure on Francisco for fuller

disclosure of corporate financial information. The family council

meeting was canceled after a brief conversation with the

attorneys to determine the nature of their involvement.

Francisco was very upset and quite worried that if the company’s

accounting and financial records were scrutinized, they would

be found lacking and this would create more chaos and family

disharmony and possibly even result in legal ramifications. The

business, as a result of a very strong entrepreneurial culture and

unsophisticated financial and administrative systems, had very

unsophisticated accounting procedures. Francisco Sr. had never

the possibility of selling a couple of parcels of company

farmland.

(3)

90

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 14 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

been very concerned about establishing such systems. Now, the

responsibility for historical reconstruction of financial

information had fallen on Francisco Jr. He said:

That was the reason that I could not be any clearer with shareholders about the books than I was. I was not hiding anything; they had the same information I had available to me. But I knew how shrewd those two attorneys that Mari hired were, and I was very worried for the family and the business’s reputation.

In the aftermath of the family council meeting, Francisco stayed

very close to his mother, Isabel, and consulted her often on what

to do. But, of course, all of this was very hard on her, as she did

not want this to be the legacy of her very successful late

husband. Francisco respected Isabel’s wisdom and her ability to

influence her daughters. Mari had hired the lawyers, but most of

her sisters were secretly rooting for her. They too wanted to

better understand what they considered to be rightfully theirs.

Isabel talked to her daughters on many occasions during that

period about the importance of preserving the family and about

the need to give Francisco time to run the company, get things in

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 15 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

shape, and show them what he could do. But her arguments did

not dissuade Mari, who continued her inquiry through her

attorneys.

About this time, company and family attorneys finally unraveled

the details of the estate plan. It was determined that upon

Francisco Sr.’s death, Francisco Jr. held 50 percent of the voting A

shares and 20 percent of the nonvoting dividend-bearing B

shares. Each of his five sisters owned 15 percent of the B shares,

and Isabel retained 5 percent of the B shares and the remaining

50 percent of the voting shares. Voting control, therefore, rested

in the hands of the founder’s surviving spouse and Francisco Jr.,

the successor president.

Hurt and disillusioned by Mari’s actions, Francisco began the

process of negotiating with Mari and her attorneys for a buyout

of her shares. On the advice of her mother-in-law, an influential

banker, Mari asked for $10 million, but she was offered $4

million. During the last round of negotiations, Francisco,

concerned about the future of both the family and the business,

agreed to $6 million on an installment basis—a price he

considered exorbitant but worth the peace of mind and the

ability to move on, both of which he so desperately wanted. Mari

agreed to this offer, and sold all of her shares to Francisco, who,

as a result, now owned 35 percent of the B shares.

Family Council and Shareholders’ Meetings,

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 16 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

October 2009

Family council meetings were not held for over a year, while the

wrangling and negotiations were going on. In October 2009,

family members held their next family council and shareholders’

meetings. (Mari, who was no longer a shareholder, decided not

to attend either meeting.) The agenda for the one-day

shareholders’ meeting and the additional day for the family

council meeting included discussion of a draft of a shareholder

buy-sell agreement, discussion of the new dividend-distribution

policy, and discussion of a draft of a family constitution. The

family constitution included an emergency contingency plan

naming Tere, the one sister active in management, as the

successor if something should happen to Francisco.

91

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 17 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

The Pruned Family Tree Grows

All this upheaval and animosity did have several positive side

effects. Francisco dedicated himself fully to the business. He fired

several members of the top-management team who were hurting

his efforts to professionalize the business, replacing them with

competent key managers. Concurrently, he began to successfully

execute a growth strategy that had been in the planning stages

for several years. In 2008, revenues and net profit rose to $112.6

million and $6.2 million, respectively. Then, in 2009, when

revenues went down slightly, to $109.7 million, net profit rose to

2005 $181,000

2006 $322,000

2007 $639,000

2008 $1,256,000

2009 $1,488,000

Table B Dividends for Industrias La Vega, 2005–

2009

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 18 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

$6.5 million (see Table A). Starting in 2008, dividends increased

significantly, which gained Francisco much respect with

shareholders.

Francisco retained a financial consultant as the CFO and, to his

delight, found that this CFO knew as much about business as he

did about finance and was a great general manager. Francisco

now had key nonfamily managers whose skills complemented

those that he and Tere brought to the corporation. Together, they

turned things around dramatically and increased company

profitability.

While Mari achieved her goal of liquidity and personal oversight

over her own inheritance, the other family members

recommitted themselves to the business and stayed involved.

The work of the family foundation continued. The foundation

was successful in getting a highway named in memory of

Francisco Sr., and all the family members got together to honor

and celebrate the family’s proud past. The increased

participation by the Valle sisters in committees, task forces, the

family council, shareholders’ meetings, and the family

foundation led to a greater sense of transparency and

ownership. As they walked to a shareholders’ meeting in the

spring of 2010, Ana reflected on the changes:

10/8/23, 2:46 PMThe Vega Food Company

Page 19 of 19https://ebooks.cenreader.com/v1/reader/stream/90f080d7-ff88-480a-a653-c98e19e98655/5/content/bd_ch_05_sect_05.html

A long time ago, my father gave one of my siblings $650,000 to buy a house. Francisco has been adjusting distributions to equalize us all with that gift. After that, we will receive our dividends based on our ownership stake and company profitability. Dividends have increased. We receive company information. We exert a great effort to be fair. We’ve come a long way.

This case was prepared by Professor Ernesto J. Poza as the

basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate the

effective or ineffective handling of a family-business

management situation. For permission to publish this case,

grateful acknowledgment is made to the chair and the

executive vice president of the company. Note that while

the case is factually accurate, the names and dates have

been changed to protect the privacy of the business family.

92 93 94

,

Chapter One.

The Nature, Importance, and Uniqueness of Family Business

The Three Generation Rule

  • Grandparents start the company
  • Children run the company
  • Grandchildren rarely see a dime

*

Course Goals

  • Gain an understanding and respect for the challenge of family-business continuity
  • Understand better the challenges and advantages faced by your own family business
  • Learn managerial, governance, and family best-practices that increase odds of family-business success

Family Business: Working Definition

  • A family business is a synthesis of:
  • Ownership control (15%+) by two or more members of a family or a partnership of families
  • Strategic influence by family members on the management of the firm
  • Concern for family relationships
  • The dream (possibility) of continuity across generations

When does an entrepreneurial company become a family business?

Typically when the next generation – “the kids” join the business within ten years of having graduated from college.

*

*

Examples of Family Businesses

  • Ford Motor Company
  • The New York Times
  • The Washington Post
  • Bigelow Tea
  • Marriott Ritz-Carlton Hotels
  • Inditex/Zara
  • L. L. Bean
  • Gap
  • Timken Steel and Bearings
  • Salvatore Ferragamo
  • Miele Appliances
  • Toyota
  • El Nuevo Día Newspaper

Wall Street Journal

  • Levi Strauss
  • Kohler
  • Nordstrom
  • Hermés
  • Wal-Mart
  • Cemex
  • SC Johnson
  • Samsung

Family Businesses…

  • Constitute 80–98% of all businesses in the world’s free economies
  • Generate about 49% of the GDP in the U.S. and more than 75% in most other countries
  • Employ about 80% of the U.S. workforce and more than 85% of the working population globally
  • Create about 85% of all new jobs in the U.S.

Family Firms Outperform

  • Family-controlled firms in the S&P 500 achieved 53% greater economic value added than their management-controlled counterparts
  • Family-controlled firms had a 6.65% greater return on assets (in EBITDA terms)
  • Family firms created an additional 10% in market value during the 1992–1999 period

Source: Anderson, R., and Deeb, D., Journal of Finance, July 2003.

  • Family firms exhibit stronger commitment to philanthropy than their non family counterparts. They also tend to engage in “strategic philanthropy”, the focused, high impact philanthropy that the William and Melinda Gates Foundation practices.1
  • Family foundations represent 55.5% of the 200 largest foundations in the US and 56% of the annual giving ($1billion).2

1 Family Business Review, in press, 2012.

2 Family Business Review, in press, 2012.

Ethics, Philanthropy, Environment and CR

Other Statistics

  • A full one-third of all Fortune 500 companies are family-controlled, and about 60 percent of all publicly traded firms remain under family influence

Other important differences

  • Average tenure of the CEO is 18 years versus 18 months to 3 years for the average CEO of an S&P 500 company
  • Average share holding time is a generation vs. 9 months in Fortune 500 companies1
  • 24 percent of family businesses surveyed have a female CEO or President. 2 This far outstrips the 2.5 percent of Fortune 1,000 firms which are led by women.3
  • Family businesses aspire to continue across generations of owners or owner-managers

1 Bain & Co., C. Zook, 2007.

2American Family Business Survey, Mass Mutual/Kennesaw State/FFI, 2007.

3Fortune Magazine, April 20, 2007.

*

What Makes Family Business Different

  • The presence of the family
  • The owner’s dream to keep the business in the family
  • The overlap of family, ownership, and management
  • The competitive advantage derived from this interaction

Succession and Continuity

  • The most prevalent reason why family-owned and family-controlled companies fail relates to a failure in succession planning
  • Three patterns of ineffective succession were identified in one study:
  • Conservative
  • Rebellious
  • Wavering

Building Family Businesses That Last

  • Takes ongoing dialogue (talking) across generations of owner-managers about their vision for the company
  • Family businesses that have been built to last recognize
  • the tension between preserving and protecting the core of what has made the business successful
  • and promoting growth and adaptation to changing competitive dynamics

Family Business Theories

  • Systems theory
  • Agency theory
  • Resource-based theory
  • Stewardship theory

Systems Theory

  • The firm is a dynamic system in which integration is achieved by adjustments between family, management, and ownership subsystems
  • Individual perspectives of family and firm may differ, leading to overemphasis on one sub-system at the expense of others

The Systems Theory Model

Family Members

Other Shareholders

Family Shareholders

Owner-Manager Family Members

Owner-Managers

Family

Employees

Non-Family Managers & Employees

Source: The Systems Model. Adapted from Davis and Tagiuri, 1981.

Family

Management

Ownership

*

Family-First Businesses

  • Employment in the business is a birthright
  • Members of the same generation are paid equally
  • Perks that transfer from the business to family members are often extensive
  • Financial systems are hidden and secrecy is often paramount
  • Commitment to continuity depends on the agendas of individual family members

Management-First Businesses

  • Employment is on the basis of qualifications—family is discouraged from working in the business
  • Performance of employed family members is reviewed in the same manner as the performance of nonfamily managers
  • Compensation is based on responsibility and performance
  • Conversation between family members is usually all business

Ownership-First Businesses

  • Investment time horizons and perceived risk are the most significant issues
  • Often have shorter time frames within which financial results are evaluated
  • Not much long-term thinking

When Things Get Messy!

  • Boundaries among family, ownership, and management systems may become blurred
  • Problems determining if decisions relate to family, ownership, or management issues
  • Family rules may overtake the business
  • Problem-solving ability diminished by blurred boundaries

Too Much Pain?

  • According to Forbes magazine, the family business has four options:
  • Sell
  • Merge with another
  • Shut it down
  • Stay the same and call Dr. Phill

Available at www.forbes.com/sites/aileron/2013/07/31/the-facts-of-family-business/

Deal With The Pain

  • If things stay the same, the family has hard decisions to make.
  • Who leaves the company?
  • Should senior family members pass the torch?
  • Hire professional manager?
  • How do we implement?

www.forbes.com/sites/aileron/2013/07/31/the-facts-of-family-business/

Joint Optimization Alternative (Best)

  • Family employment policy
  • Not all family members are employees; some are responsible shareholders
  • The performance reviews are the same for everyone
  • Family members are encouraged to get experience
  • Everyone has a commitment to family business continuity

Agency Theory

  • Traditional theory: the natural alignment of owners and managers decreases agency costs of ownership in family firms
  • Recent research: the altruism of owner-managers leads to increased agency costs
  • Choosing less risk
  • Or, choose poor business decisions
  • Agency costs can be controlled by policy and practice
  • A Board of Directors is important in monitoring managerial behavior and controlling costs

The Strategic Perspective: Competitive

  • Shrinking product life cycles
  • Intense cost competition
  • Diesel fuel
  • Beef costs?
  • Rapid change in distribution and value chains aside from block-chain
  • Increasing individualism of younger generations
  • The entrenchment of the current-generation CEO

Resource-Based Theory

  • Resource-based theory highlights unique capabilities or resources that family firms convert into competitive advantage
  • These resources/ capabilities are often referred to as organizational competencies
  • The ability of a particular family business to capitalize (leverage) on its unique advantages depends on the quality of the interaction between business and family

Core Competencies to Competitive Advantage

  • Concentrated ownership structure may lead to higher overall corporate productivity and longer-term commitment to investments in people and innovation
  • The nature of the family–ownership–management interaction, family unity, and ownership commitment may:
  • Support patient capital, lower administrative costs, skills/knowledge transfer across generations
  • Provide agility in rapidly changing markets
  • Focus on quality, customers, and higher returns
  • Protect the company (family) name

Stewardship Theory

  • Claims that founding family members view the firm as an extension of themselves. Therefore, view the continuing health of the enterprise as connected with their own well-being
  • Owners inherit a responsibility to others, to stewardship, so that the enterprise they received from the earlier generation may successfully pass on to the next
  • As stewards of the firm, family owners often place individuals on the board that can provide objective advice and advocate for a going concern
  • The independence of the board has a positive impact on the financial performance of the firm through its advisory role more than through its monitoring or supervisory function

Lower Overall Costs

  • Cost of capital is very low when the business owner controls stock
  • Financing for other businesses:
  • 25–30% for venture capital
  • 17–20% for mezzanine financing
  • Prime rate for bank financing, plus risk, plus underwriting
  • The overlap between owner and manager allows family-owned businesses to enjoy lower administrative costs because of lower CEO compensation, reduced levels of supervision, and reduced investment in financial systems and controls

Source: deVisscher, F., “When shareholders lose their patience,” Family Business Magazine, Autumn 2000; and Gomez-Mejia, L., Larraza-Kintana, M., and Makri. M., “The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations,” Academy of Management Journal.

Agility and Flexibility

  • The greater flexibility of new manufacturing and distribution-retail-service technology makes smaller runs economically attractive
  • Customization, changing consumer preferences, and shorter product life cycles reward agility
  • EDI/Internet-based partnerships in the supply chain make agility possible across value chain

Source: Poza, E., “Look who’s out there on the cutting edge.” Family Business Magazine 4 (1), Winter 1993.

Patient Capital and
Long-Term Perspective

  • Average tenure of 18 years for owner-managers (vs. <8 years for public company CEOs) is correlated with commitment to making efficient long-term investments in the family business
  • The company continually optimizes the mix among family, management, employees, customers, and ownership for higher long-term profitability

Source: Daily, C. and Dollinger, M., “An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms,” Family Business Review 5 (2), 1992; James, H., “Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm,” International Journal of the Economics of Business 6 (1), 1999; and Adapted from Waterman, Robert H., Jr. What America Does Right. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1994.

The Starting Place

,

Chapter Two

The Family Dynamics Challenge

Chapter 2

*

Unhealthy Family Culture

  • Characterized by:
  • Secrecy
  • Lack of information
  • Low levels of family emotional intelligence (EQ)
  • Little knowledge of the business among at least some family members

Chapter 2

*

How Did This Happen?

  • A result of:
  • A founding culture that supported autocratic leadership
  • The family’s belief in the benefits of privacy
  • Zero-sum dynamics: win-lose between members or branches

Chapter 2

*

Two Very Different Family Cultures 1

  • The Binghams
  • Louisville Courier-Journal Companies
  • Sold the company after years of bickering
  • The sale of the company did not bring the family together as hoped
  • Relationships characterized by emotional distance
  • Absent was:
  • A commitment to family-business continuity
  • A family “trust catalyst”
  • A board with independent outsiders
  • Family meetings

Two Very Different Family Cultures 2

  • The Blethens
  • Seattle Times Company
  • Continue to own and operate several newspapers in to the fifth generation
  • Present is:
  • A commitment to continuity (even in the face of a financially crippling strike)
  • Individual responsibility to the group
  • A sense of stewardship
  • Family unity
  • Frequent family meetings

Zero-Sum Dynamics and Family Culture

  • Zero-sum dynamics are characterized by exchanges in which one party’s perceived gain is the other party’s perceived loss
  • The absence of growth (and increased wealth and career opportunities) in the family business is fertile ground for zero-sum dynamics
  • Illiquid enterprises (not much cash & convertibles)
  • The us-and-them dynamic can be triggered by any perceived difference:
  • male–female, active in management–inactive in the firm, older–younger, richer–poorer, educated-not educated, etc.

The Family Systems Perspective 1

  • Family is the building block of emotional life
  • Uses systems thinking to understand complex interaction between members of the family
  • Change in a member’s behavior is likely to be sustainable at the family level than at the individual level
  • Interdependence is the source of social/physical/intellectual/emotional rewards in the family
  • May give rise to conflicting needs, desires, and priorities as the family grows and ages

The Family Systems Perspective 2

  • Families often look to an individual to blame whenever there is trouble and tensions
  • Sharing responsibility for the difficulty and its remediation is more effective than individual solutions (shared solution)
  • Family origins influence:
  • Patterns and processes set in motion from two or three preceding generations still matter
  • The analysis of earlier generations is essential to understanding what ails or distresses a family in the present

The Family-Business Interaction Factor

  • High scores on family unity combined with high scores in career opportunities in the business produced a high score indicating a positive family-business interaction
  • This positive family-business interaction factor was a great predictor of the number of best management/ governance practices implemented and the source of a hypothesized virtuous cycle

Source: Poza, E., Hanlon, S., and Kishida, R. “Does the family-business interaction factor represent a resource or a cost?” Family Business Review, June 2004, pp. 99–118.

Chapter 2

*

The Family-Business Interaction Factor

Family Unity Index

Source: Poza, E., Hanlon, S., and Kishida, R. “Does the family-business interaction factor represent a resource or a cost?” Family Business Review, June 2004, pp. 99–118.

High correlation with effective management, feedback, succession planning, advisory boards, and family meetings.

Chapter 2

*

Conflict Management

  • Family meetings can provide a forum for minimizing the potential for conflict and addressing the troublesome problems that confront multigenerational families
  • Family meetings can address existing problems such as:
  • Frustration over alienation or lack of inclusion
  • Anger over the unfairness of hiring practices, promotions, family benefits, etc.
  • Frustration over dividends and lack of liquidity

Bowen’s Family Systems Theory (FST)

  • Emotions are powerful given the context of family history
  • Differentiation is a foundational principle of FST
  • individual thought and reflection can promote an individual functioning above historic patterns, even under conditions of stress
  • Triangulation is used to learn about relationships
  • pattern among three people
  • Third person listens to triangulate what is wrong
  • Cutoffs are unresolved emotional attachments to parents
  • Leads to family members distancing themselves from their family of origin
  • May “repeat the sins of their past”

Family Emotional Intelligence (EQ)

  • Capacity to recognize feelings and those of others
  • Ability to manage emotions and relationships
  • Seeks to increase ability to handle feelings with skill and harmony
  • Make better decisions through teamwork for family unity
  • Emotional Competence Inventories:
  • 360-degree feedback process
  • particularly helpful to next-generation members of a family in business
  • A little pricy, but worth it!

Social Styles of Behavior

  • Based on the work of Dr. James Taylor
  • Extensively developed by Dr. David Merrill and Roger Reid (1964)
  • Now owned by TRACOM Group.
  • Gets away from personality
  • Behavior is Observable!

What is Social Style?

  • Our behavior as we interact with other people.
  • Understanding how we come “Across” to others
  • Understanding the social styles of others
  • Working with others and their social styles
  • The goal is to obtain “Versatility”

Tell Me More About Social Styles

Available at www.traconcorp.com/solutions/by-elements/social-style/model/. Downloaded on 10/21/2015 by S.M. Sexton for use at the University of North Texas.

Counterproductive Behaviors

Counterproductive behaviors detract from performance and actually cost the organization. Let’s look at each of these types of behavior in a bit more detail.

Absenteeism – when an employee does not show up for work.

Turnover – annual percentage of an organization’s workforce that leaves and must be replaced.

*

Personality at Work

  • Personality
  • The relatively stable set of psychological attributes that distinguish one person from another
  • May manifest in behavior
  • *Avoid doing harm with interpretations of results
  • You can damage a person’s psyche publishing results
  • Numerous instruments out there in paper and pencil form or Web based
  • Meyers Briggs Framework based on Carl Jung
  • MBTI for communication & interaction styles
  • BFI
  • Others

Personality is the relatively stable set of psychological attributes that distinguish one person from another. In recent years, researchers have identified five fundamental traits that are especially relevant to organizations. These are commonly called the “big five” personality traits

*

The “Big Five” Personality Traits

The “Big Five” Personality Traits The “big five” personality traits are shown in Figure 8.1 and can be summarized as follows.

*

What Are The “Big Five” Personality Traits?

  • Agreeableness
  • a person’s ability to get along with others
  • Conscientiousness
  • a reflection of the number of things a person tries to accomplish
  • High correlated with organizational success
  • Measures:
  • good nature
  • cooperation
  • how trusting

Agreeableness is a person’s ability to get along with others.

Conscientiousness in this context refers to the individual’s persistence, dependableness, and orderliness. Highly conscientious people tend to focus on relatively few tasks at one time; as a result, they are likely to be organized, systematic, careful, thorough, responsible, and self-disciplined.

Emotionality refers to the degree to which people tend to be positive or negative in their outlook and behaviors toward others. People with positive emotionality are relatively poised, calm, resilient, and secure; people with negative emotionality are more excitable, insecure, reactive, and subject to mood swings.

*

More “Big Five” Personality Traits

  • Emotionality
  • the degree to which people tend to be positive or negative in their outlook and behaviors toward others
  • Extraversion
  • a person’s comfort level with relationships
  • Openness
  • reflects how open or rigid a person is in terms of his or her beliefs
  • imagination

Extraversion refers to a person’s comfort level with relationships. Extroverts are sociable, talkative, assertive, and open to establishing new relationships. Introverts are much less sociable, talkative, and assertive, and more reluctant to begin new relationships.

Openness reflects how open or rigid a person is in terms of his or her beliefs. People with high levels of openness are curious and willing to listen to new ideas and to change their own ideas, beliefs, and attitudes in response to new information. People with low levels of openness tend to be less receptive to new ideas and less willing to change their minds.

*

Planning and Policy Making

  • Family councils foster open and safe processes for sharing information
  • The focus of family councils should be conversations, deliberations, and policy making
  • The council may suggest policies such as:
  • Employment and subcontractor policies
  • Board service and family council service policies
  • Dividend and liquidity policies
  • A family constitution

,

Chapter Three

The Ownership Challenge

Chapter 3

*

The Systems Theory Model

Family Members

Other Shareholders

Family Shareholders

Owner-Manager Family Members

Owner-Managers

Family

Employees

Non-Family Managers & Employees

Source: The Systems Model. Adapted from Davis and Tagiuri, 1981.

Chapter Three

Family

Management

Ownership

*

Concentrated Family Ownership

  • Results in higher overall corporate productivity with elements of:
  • Systems, Resource, Stewardship theories
  • The higher performance seemed to be related to the different posture taken by these firms toward:
  • Diversification
  • Investment in training and development
  • Research and development

Investments in the Ownership Subsystem

  • If a family business is going to preserve one of its intangible competitive advantages.
  • We are family.
  • That means investing in:
  • The design and execution of an appropriate ownership (stock) and control structure
  • The education, access to information, and engagement of shareholders
  • The creation of institutions that govern the ownership–firm interaction

Shareholder Meetings

  • Represent one of the best opportunities to educate owners about their responsibilities and what the company and its management expect of shareholders
  • Allow for financial, business, and competitive information-sharing and communication on other issues critical to a family firm in a disciplined and proactive manner
  • Represent the best safeguard to a healthy governance of the family’s influence on the business and vice versa

Two Missions: Some Alignment

Ownership:

Return on Invested

Capital, Family Unity,

Shareholder Value,

Continuity?

Management:

Competitiveness,

Growth, Career

Opportunity,

Profit?

There is overlap here.

Adapted from: Chrisman et al, Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family-Centered Non-Economic Goals in Small Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 2010, 1-27.

Educating and Informing Shareholders

  • Family shareholders expecting to fulfill their responsibility of aligning management interests with shareholder priorities by:

holding management accountable

a thorough understanding of financial statements

Profit &Loss statement at minimum

Year to year comparison (or quarter to quarter)

making sense of what the numbers say about the firm and its competitive condition

Without this knowledge, family-business shareholders can become indifferent and impatient

  • This will hamper effective operation of the family-controlled business

And lead to erosion of founding culture

Shareholder Responsibilities to the Company

  • Define and then demand reasonable returns on shareholder equity or invested assets
  • Strong family members could pressure for short term rewards
  • Provide the values and principles of doing business and ensure they remain instilled in the company (see handout)
  • Define the owning family’s strategy and communicate family priorities

Governance of the Shareholder–Firm Relationship

  • The interaction between ownership, family, and management is a source of competitive advantage
  • It is simultaneously the source of the biggest challenge faced by family firms:
  • the effective governance of the shareholder–firm relationship

The Role of the Board

  • The role of the board is prominent in the governance of the relationship between the owner–family–business interaction
  • Balance of moderate family members with independent directors
  • A board that does not exclude family members
  • Leads to better financial performance
  • Next-generation leaders of family companies frequently restructure the board
  • Requires board members to conduct research

What is a Board of Directors?

Meetings and Family Councils

  • Most of the absolutely essential communication, education, and sharing of financial and strategic information takes place in regularly scheduled
  • shareholder meetings, family meetings, and family council meetings
  • This keeps the shareholders involved and fulfills the legal requirement to recognize the rights of minority shareholders
  • When the extended family is large and the ownership structure has not been pruned, representative family councils may be a vehicle for educating and informing family shareholders
  • Representative councils or committees of the council, sometimes referred to as “asset boards,” can also provide the board
  • with input regarding the family strategy
  • develop policies regarding family participation in the firm

Educate the Shareholders

  • Sharing the estate plan
  • Shareholder understanding of financial statement with some degree of comprehension
  • Shareholders can reach accurate conclusions about what the financial information means and the managerial actions it should prompt only:
  • with study, perspective from the experience of others, and information about competitors
  • As part of their financial literacy, owners should also be able to understand
  • the capital structure of the firm
  • know debt levels in relation to owners’ equity (debt to equity)
  • The ability to operate independently or introduce leverage and influence

Ownership Structure: Leading

  • Leaders of enterprises find that distributing voting shares equally among shareholders often erodes a next-generation owner-manager’s ability to lead
  • Unlike ownership, the authority to lead is earned rather than inherited
  • Transferring ownership without an eye toward corporate control makes it more difficult to acquire the authority to lead

Ownership and Classes of Stock

  • Ownership structures do not transfer well across generations
  • One approach to this challenge is to redesign the capital or ownership structure of the company by recapitalizing its stock
  • (e.g., recapitalizing the common stock into two classes: voting and nonvoting)
  • Phantom stock can also be created in order to provide the incentives for key nonfamily management to behave like owners
  • Phantom stock mirrors the value of regular company stock but does not dilute the family’s actual ownership and has no voting rights
  • You must cash out the manager if they leave https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTB3W5HZCuM
  • Herschend leaders discuss family business engagement strategies – YouTube

Buy–Sell Agreements

  • Contractual agreements between shareholders and the company
  • Typically used by family-business owners to facilitate an orderly exchange of stock in the corporation for cash
  • Often the primary vehicle through which family shareholders can realize value from their highly illiquid and unmarketable wealth—company stock
  • The most obvious benefit of a buy–sell agreement is that it allows some family members to remain patient shareholders while providing liquidity to family members with other interests or goals

,

Chapter Four.

The Governance and Professionalization Challenge

It’s All Greek

  • Governance comes from the Greek term “to steer.”
  • Current family business research mirrors Corporate research as to outcomes.
  • What is missing are the outcomes important to families!

Family Governance

  • Essential for the long-term well-being of the business and wealth
  • The ability to control relationships between family, managers, and shareholders
  • Protects unity and capital
  • Financial
  • Human
  • Social

Family Governance Structures

Source: Poza, Family Business, 3e, 2010.

Shareholder

Meetings

Family Office

Family

Enterprise

Ownership

Family

Council

Top

Management

Board of

Directors

*

The Systems Theory Model

Family Members

Other Shareholders

Family Shareholders

Owner-Manager Family Members

Owner-Managers

Family

Employees

Non-Family Managers & Employees

Source: The Systems Model. Adapted from Davis and Tagiuri, 1981.

Family

Management

Ownership

*

What happens when we overlay Systems Theory with the Family Governance Structure?

Systems Theory and Governance Structures

Family Members

Other Shareholders

Family Shareholders

Owner-Manager Family Members

Owner-Managers

Family

Employees

Non-Family Managers & Employees

Overlay of Two Family Business Models. Source: The Systems Model. Adapted from Davis and Tagiuri, 1981. Source: Poza, Family Business, 3e, 2010.

Shareholder

Meetings

Family Office

Family

Enterprise

Ownership

Family

Council

Top

Management

Ownership

& Board

*

Family Systems Theory

  • We must manage interrelated subsystems:
  • Family
  • Management
  • Ownership
  • Larger system must be effective and successful
  • May lead to blurred boundaries

More Blurred Boundaries

  • Can lead to vision and leadership issues
  • Nepotism, hallo effect, & entitlement
  • Losses of identity, values, sense of fairness, culture and wealth
  • Festering into conflict, lack of oversight, secrecy, and selfishness

Professionalization Challenge

  • Requires professional family and non-family managers
  • An organizational structure aligned with strategy
  • Policies that promote delegation
  • Family firms must be willing to:
  • Employ non-family executives
  • Exclude incompetent family members
  • Establish Policies (SHRM)

The Family Constitution

  • Usually for larger companies
  • Has no legal standing!
  • Influence is felt in other legal documents, buy-sell agreements, etc.
  • Supports family intentions and goodwill.
  • Can support family philanthropy efforts

Managing Succession

  • Very difficult to pick one member over another member
  • A board can take a third person approach to the problem
  • Consultants can take an independent approach
  • Co-CEOs rarely work in reality
  • Someone must be in charge!

Mapping The Family Business Governance Cluster

Business Family

Long

Term

Short

Term

  • Human Resources
  • Governance Structure
  • Family Ownership
  • Family Control
  • Business mission and goals
  • Role of Network
  • Decision Making

Adapted from: Yu, Lumpkin, Sorenson, and Brigham. (2012).

Mapping The Family Business Governance Cluster

Business Family

Long

Term

Short

Term

Adapted from: Yu, Lumpkin, Sorenson, and Brigham. (2012).

,

Chapter Five

Diagnosing the Family Business and Creating Conditions for the Continued Spirit of Enterprise

Chapter 2

*

Challenges to Continuity

  • Neither the classic system model by Davis & Tagiuri2, nor the widely known McKinsey 7S Model3, helps us sufficiently understand the complexity of the family firm.
  • Coupling this with the superimposition of family and ownership creates challenges for understanding, leading, and providing advice to:
  • family-owned or
  • family-controlled businesses

2Gersick, K., Davis, J., McCollom, M., Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to Generation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

3Waterman, R. (1982). The seven elements of strategic fit, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 2, No. 3, 69-73.

The Systems Theory Model

Family Members

Other Shareholders

Family Shareholders

Owner-Manager Family Members

Owner-Managers

Family

Employees

Non-Family Managers & Employees

Source: The Systems Model. Adapted from Davis and Tagiuri, 1981.

Family

Management

Ownership

*

The Systems Theory Model

Source: The Systems Model. Adapted from Davis and Tagiuri, 1981.

2.

3.

1.

*

The McKinsey 7S Model

Where is harmony captured?

Strategic Business Integration Model

  • Resources
  • Organization

Culture, Structure, Systems, & Relations

  • Management

Adapted from: D’Souza, D.E., and Miles, G.E. (2005) Business Strategy Integration class at the University of North Texas.

Is There a Better Model?

  • Anecdotal evidence and empirical research now suggests that multigenerational family business success requires:
  • getting the business strategy right
  • building trust and family harmony, and
  • installing governance mechanisms (boards and family councils)
  • The author suggests that a more holistic, particularistic and robust diagnosis and intervention model would prove useful to family business owners, advisors and scholars alike.

The 12S Family Enterprise Model

Complex for

first-generation businesses.

Information Systems

The Family Enterprise Model

Family Vision & Commitment to Continuity

© 2014 S.M. Sexton. Adapted from: Poza, E.J. and Daugherty, M.S. (2010). Family Business (4th. Ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning, Inc.

Diagnostic Questions from the F.E. Model

Is the owning family clear on what it wants from the business?

Are each of the family businesses pursuing growth opportunities?

Are successors pursuing a vision and plan based on their experience managing profits and losses?

Is there a board of directors for the enterprise or the family office that meets regularly?

Is there a family council that meets regularly?

Is there financial transparency in the family enterprises and family office?

Long Term Commitment

  • Multi-generational family shareholders must be treated transparently and professionally.
  • Why? Ownership structure; the advantage of patient family capital and active oversight by responsible shareholders.
  • Movie; Million Dollar Arm
  • This resource can only be tapped and turned into competitive advantage:
  • through “family handcuffs”
  • by nurturing family members not employed in the business into remaining “patient capitalists.”

Protecting the Ultimate Resource

  • Dysfunctional family dynamics can undermine trust in the assessment of family business performance.
  • Stock sales are not an option because shares in a privately-held family company are illiquid and unmarketable.
  • Families have to continually re-invest in the development of a culture of trust in order to protect patient family capital.

Organizational Culture

  • A set of values, beliefs, and assumptions that influence the practices and behaviors of organizational members
  • Stories, pictures, trophies, flags, etc.
  • Largely reflects what has proven successful over time, to an organization
  • It becomes so matter of fact that the culture, and its values and beliefs, drop out of awareness (back stage or not reinforced)
  • That is, until the culture is found wanting or
  • There are new challenges to the established culture

Chapter 2

*

Cultural Blur

  • Little differentiation of the assumptions that go into decision making on the basis of it being a family, an ownership, or a management issue
  • Family values and rules are often used in the business
  • Business values and rules are used in the family
  • Cultural blur may enable families in business to avoid conflict and the anxiety it provokes
  • By minimizing differences that sometimes lead to conflict, problem-solving ability is diminished
  • We don’t do what is right for the business
  • Going too far

Chapter 2

*

Cultural Blur (cont.)

  • Cultural blur may endow the business with “invisible crossovers” that provide it with what the strategy literature refers to as “intangible assets” that can be turned into competitive advantages, e.g.:
  • Love – quality and caring customer service
  • Commitment – patient capital and transfer of knowledge
  • Independence – low debt/equity ratio
  • Work ethic – productivity
  • Creativity – entrepreneurship and innovation

Enterprise Success and Longevity

  • Research suggests that success and longevity are linked to:
  • Strong culture
  • Stable culture
  • Culture that fits the strategy of the business
  • Culture that is flexible and agile when needed
  • Biz Mart

Chapter 2

*

Problem: Erosion of the Entrepreneurial Culture

  • The family becomes paralyzed because of conflicting views across generations, can become inward-looking fertile ground for turf wars and feelings of entitlement.
  • This causes them to forget the most basic competitive advantage in relation to larger, more bureaucratic corporations—its nimbleness
  • By focusing inside, it can lose the ability to keep an eye on new competitive dynamics and the ever-changing marketplace
  • The family becomes a cost to the firm

The Family-Business Crossover Effect

  • “Most American newspapers have switched from family to corporate ownership, the latest example being Times Mirror. But I don’t think it’s an accident that the newspapers best known for quality in this country—The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Los Angeles Times, the Boston Globe, the Washington Post…are family controlled.”

– Katharine Graham, WSJ, March 20, 2000.

Chapter 2

*

Incumbent Generation Leadership

  • Keeps the business healthy and successful
  • Builds the institutions that will effectively govern the family-business interaction:
  • strong board, family meetings, key nonfamily employees in top management, equity structure that facilitates control, and buy–sell agreements
  • Too easy to give up!
  • In effect “cleans house for the next generation” before transferring power
  • This then allows the next generation to focus on the future, not on the past
  • Steel fabrication plant case

Chapter 2

*

Next-Generation Partnership

  • The next generation:
  • Provides the customer-driven vision that promotes innovation and regenerates the company
  • Creates a partnership with:
  • Other family members through the family council, family meetings, shareholder meetings and hundreds of informal conversations that inform and educate
  • Newsletter? Instagram?
  • Key nonfamily management through top management team, operating committees, etc.
  • Boards of directors
  • New members of the ever-changing supply chain
  • Banks and creditors
  • Engage in a lifelong journey of preparation for leadership rather than “rushing to the Presidency,” and then act as stewards of the family and its wealth

Chapter 2

*

Change and Competitive Advantage

  • Change agents must work toward building organizational competencies
  • Beyond capabilities (which are good)
  • Resource view of organizations suggests that family businesses have specific, complex, and intangible resources
  • These include:
  • Structure & Management systems
  • Social capital & Staff
  • Brand & reputation

Capabilities to Competencies

  • Firm’s collective skill in using resources to create goods and services
  • Often called capabilities and may be outsourced
  • Distinctive Competencies
  • Unique to our firm
  • Core Competencies
  • Central to the firm’s main business operations

Followers Need To Know…

  • What is being changed.
  • Why the change is needed.
  • What is expected of them.
  • What are the benefits to them.
  • What problems may arise and how they will be handled.
  • What changes in behavior are required in programs, tasks, & activities.