Research Paper: This is a graduate course and students will be expected to research and write papers summarizing in their own words what they have found on current topics from the weekly readings. Research is a theoretical review of relevant literature and application of findings in the literature to a topic related to a specific industry, field, or business problem. The research must be conducted using peer-reviewed trade or academic journals. While Blogs, Wikipedia, encyclopedias, course textbooks, popular magazines, newspaper articles, online websites, etc. are helpful for providing background information, these resources are NOT suitable resources for this research assignment. Please Note: The UC Library staff are very helpful with assisting students in using the UC Online Library journal database. Please contact them if you have issues. In addition, the instructor has provided additional resources, including a research tutorial, in the “Course Resources” folder in the “Content” area of the course. Assignment Requirements:
- Choose a research topic from the chapter readings
- Research/find a minimum at least four (4), preferably five (5) or more, different peer-reviewed articles on your topic from the University of the Cumberlands Library online business database. The article(s) must be relevant and from a peer-reviewed source. While you may use relevant articles from any time frame, current/published within the last five (5) years are preferred. Using literature that is irrelevant or unrelated to the chosen topic will result in a point reduction.
- Write a four (4) to five (5) page double spaced paper in APA format discussing the findings on your specific topic in your own words. Note – paper length does not include cover page, abstract, or references page(s).
- Structure your paper as follows:
- Cover page
- Overview describing the importance of the research topic to current business and professional practice in your own words.
- Purpose of Research should reflect the potential benefit of the topic to the current business and professional practice and the larger body of research.
- Review of the Literature summarized in your own words. Note that this should not be a “copy and paste” of literature content, nor should this section be substantially filled with direct quotes from the article. A literature review is a summary of the major points and findings of each of the selected articles (with appropriate citations). Direct quotations should be used sparingly. Normally, this will be the largest section of your paper (this is not a requirement; just a general observation).
- Practical Application of the literature. Describe how your findings from the relevant research literature can shape, inform, and improve current business and professional practice related to your chosen topic.
- Conclusion in your own words
- References formatted according to APA style requirements
Grading Criteria:
- Content Knowledge & Structure: All of the requested components are completed as assigned; content is on topic and related to advance human resource management, critical thinking is clearly demonstrated (few, if any, direct quotations from the source in the paper); scholarly research is demonstrated; topics and concepts gained from the assigned reading and/or from research is evident.
- Critical Thinking: Demonstrates substantial critical thinking about topics and solid interpretation of materials and reflection.
- Clarity & Effective Communication: Communication is clear, concise, and well presented; scholarly writing is demonstrated; grammar, sentence structure, writing in third person, and word choice is used correctly.
- Integration of Knowledge & Articles: Articles used are current and relevant (preferably published within last five (5) years and MUST be from peer-reviewed journal article publications. At least four (4) peer-reviewed journal articles are examined and analyzed in the paper.
- Presentation & Writing Mechanics: Cover page, headings, in-text citations, page citations (page number citations required for specific information such as dates, years, list of items from article, names, numbers, statistics, and other specific information), and references are properly formatted.
Please Note: Plagiarism will not be tolerated. The paper must be written in your own words.
CHAPTER 7
Followership
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 1 of 3)
Effectively manage both up and down the hierarchy
Recognize your followership style and take steps to become a more effective follower
Understand the leader’s role in developing effective followers
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 2 of 3)
Apply the principles of effective followership, including responsibility, service, challenging authority, participating in change, and knowing when to leave
Implement the strategies for effective followership at school or work
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 3 of 3)
Know what followers want from leaders and what leaders expect from followers
Use feedback and leadership coaching to help followers grow and achieve their potential
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 7.1 – Good Leaders Manage Both Up and Down the Hierarchy
Source: Based on Mark Hurwitz and Samantha Hurwitz, ‘‘The Romance of the Follower: Part 2,’’ Industrial and Commercial Training 41, no. 4 (2009), pp. 199–206.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Managing Up
Consciously and deliberately developing a meaningful, task-related, mutually respectful relationship with your direct superiors
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Managing Up Presents Unique Challenges
Discomfort with the idea of managing bosses
Not in control of the relationship
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
What Your Leader Wants from You
Make-it-happen attitude
Willingness to collaborate
Motivation to stay up to date
Passion to drive your own growth
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Styles of Followership
Style is determined by two dimensions
Critical thinking versus uncritical thinking
Active versus passive behavior
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Critical and Uncritical Thinking
Critical thinking
Thinking independently and being mindful of the effects of one’s own and other people’s behavior on achieving the organization’s vision
Uncritical thinking
Failing to consider possibilities beyond what one is told
Accepting the leader’s ideas without thinking
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 7.2 – Followership Styles
Source: Based on information in Robert E. Kelley, The Power of Followership (New York: Doubleday, 1992)
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Strategies for Managing Up
Understand the leader
Learn goals, needs, strengths and weaknesses, and organizational constraints
Study the leader’s work style
Use specific tactics to improve relationship
Be a resource
Help the leader be a good leader
Build a relationship with the leader
View the leader realistically
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 7.3 – Ways to Influence Your Leader
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 7.4 – Sources of Power for Managing Up
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Necessary Courage to Manage Up
Courage to assume responsibility
Courage to challenge
Courage to participate in transformation
Courage to serve
Courage to live
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 7.5 – Rank Order of Desirable Characteristics
Source: Adapted from James M. Kouzes and Barry Z. Posner, Credibility: How Leaders Gain and Lose It, Why People Demand It (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993), p. 255.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leaders Enhance Followers’ Abilities and Contributions
Clarity of direction
Opportunities for growth
Frequent, specific, and immediate feedback
Protection from organization intrusions
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leadership Coaching
A method of directing or facilitating a follower with the aim of improving specific skills or achieving a specific development goal
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 7.6 – Follower Benefits from Leadership Coaching
Source: ‘‘The Business Leader as Development Coach,’’ PDI Portfolio (Winter 1996), p. 6; and Personnel Decisions International, http://www.personneldecisions.com.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Feedback
Using evaluation and communication to help individuals and the organization learn and improve
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Feedback Tips
Make it timely
Focus on the performance, not the person
Make it specific
Focus on the desired future, not the past
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
image4.jpeg
image5.png
image6.png
image7.png
image8.png
image9.png
image10.png
,
CHAPTER 6
Courage and Moral Leadership
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 1 of 2)
Combine a rational approach to leadership with a concern for people and ethics
Understand how leaders set the ethical tone in organizations and recognize the distinction between ethical and unethical leadership
Recognize your own stage of moral development and ways to accelerate your moral maturation
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 2 of 2)
Know and use mechanisms that enhance an ethical organizational culture
Apply the principles of stewardship and servant leadership
Recognize courage in others and unlock your own potential to live and act courageously
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Ethical Climate in Business
Leaders face pressures that challenge their ability to do the right thing
Obstacles for leaders:
Personal weakness and self-interest
Pressures to:
Cut costs and increase profits
Meet the demands of vendors or business partners and look successful
Please shareholders
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leaders Set the Ethical Tone (slide 1 of 2)
Act as positive role models
Signal what matters by their behavior
Focus on employees, customers, and the greater good
Not paying attention to gaining benefits themselves
Honest with employees, partners, customers, vendors, and shareholders
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leaders Set the Ethical Tone (slide 2 of 2)
Strive for fairness and honor agreements
Share the credit for successes and accept the blame when things go wrong
Speak up against acts they believe are wrong
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 6.1 – Comparing Ethical versus Unethical Leadership
Source: Based on Donald G. Zauderer, ‘‘Integrity: An Essential Executive Quality,’’ Business Forum (Fall 1992), pp. 12–16.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Acting Like a Moral Leader
Business is about values and not just economic performance
The single most important factor in ethical decision making in organizations is whether leaders show a commitment to ethics in their talk and especially their behavior
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 6.2 – How to Act Like a Moral Leader
Source: Based on Linda Klebe Treviño, Laura Pincus Hartman, and Michael Brown, ‘‘Moral Person and Moral Manager: How Executives Develop a Reputation for Ethical Leadership,’’ California Management Review 42, no. 4 (Summer 2000), pp. 128–142; Christopher Hoenig, ‘‘Brave Hearts,’’ CIO (November 1, 2000), pp. 72–74; and Patricia Wallington, ‘‘Honestly?!’’ CIO (March 15, 2003), pp. 41–42.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 6.3 – More Than Wheels Core Values
Source: More Than Wheels Mission and Core Values, http://www.morethanwheels.org/mission (Retrieved May 18, 2013).
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Moral Leadership
Distinguishing right from wrong and doing right; seeking the just, honest, and good in the practice of leadership
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 6.4 – Three Levels of Personal Moral Development
Sources: Based on Lawrence Kohlberg, ‘‘Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach,’’ in Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues, ed. Thomas Likona (Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976), pp. 31–53; and Jill W. Graham, ‘‘Leadership, Moral Development, and Citizenship Behavior,’’ Business Ethics Quarterly 5, no. 1 (January 1995), pp. 43–54.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 6.5 – Changing Leader Focus from Self to Others
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Authoritarian Management
Traditional leadership
Organizational stability and efficiency are paramount
Leaders
Direct and control their people
Set the strategy and goals, as well as the methods and rewards for attaining them
Subordinates are controlled by leaders
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Participative Management
Increased employee participation through employee suggestion programs, participation groups, and quality circles
Paternalistic mindset
Leaders determine purpose and goals, make final decisions, and decide rewards
Employees suggest quality improvements, act as team players, and take greater responsibility for their own jobs
Employees are not true partners in the enterprise
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Stewardship
A belief that leaders are deeply accountable to others as well as to the organization, without trying to control others, define meaning and purpose for others, or take care of others
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Framework for Stewardship
Adopt a partnership mindset
Give decision-making power and the authority to act to those closest to the work and the customer
Tie rewards to contributions rather than formal positions
Expect core work teams to build the organization
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Servant Leadership
Leadership in which the leader transcends self-interest to serve the needs of others, help others grow, and provide opportunities for others to gain materially and emotionally
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Framework for Servant Leadership
Put service before self-interest
Listen first to affirm others
Inspire trust by being trustworthy
Nourish others and help them become whole
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Courage (slide 1 of 2)
The mental and moral strength to engage in, persevere through, and withstand danger, difficulty, or fear
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Courage (slide 2 of 2)
Courage means accepting responsibility
Courage often means nonconformity
Courage means pushing beyond the comfort zone
Courage means asking for what you want and saying what you think
Courage means fighting for what you believe
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Abilene Paradox
The tendency of people to resist voicing their true thoughts or feelings in order to please others and avoid conflict
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
How Does Courage Apply to Moral Leadership
Acting like a moral leader requires personal courage
Opposing unethical conduct requires courage
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Whistleblowing
Employee disclosure of illegal, immoral, or unethical practices in the organization
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Finding Personal Courage
Believe in a higher purpose
Draw strength from others
Harness frustration and anger
Take small steps
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
image4.jpeg
image5.png
image6.png
image7.png
image8.png
image9.png
,
CHAPTER 4
The Leader as an Individual
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 1 of 3)
Understand the importance of self-awareness and recognize your blind spots
Identify major personality dimensions and understand how personality influences leadership and relationships within organizations
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 2 of 3)
Clarify your instrumental and end values and recognize how values guide thoughts and behavior
Define attitudes and explain their relationship to leader behavior
Explain attributions and recognize how perception affects the leader–follower relationship
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 3 of 3)
Recognize individual differences in cognitive style and broaden your own thinking style to expand leadership potential
Understand how to lead and work with people with varied personality traits
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Self-Awareness
Being conscious of the internal aspects of one’s nature, such as personality traits, emotions, values, attitudes, and perceptions, and appreciating how your patterns affect other people
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Blind Spots
Characteristics or habits that people are not aware of or don’t recognize as problems but which limit their effectiveness and hinder their career success
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Importance of Self-Awareness
Effective leaders know who they are and what they stand for
Allow people to know what to expect from them
People require self-reflection to avoid blind spots that limit effectiveness and career success
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Personality
The set of unseen characteristics and processes that underlie a relatively stable pattern of behavior in response to ideas, objects, and people in the environment
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Big Five Personality Dimensions (slide 1 of 6)
Five general dimensions that describe personality: extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to experience
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Big Five Personality Dimensions (slide 2 of 6)
Extroversion: Degree to which a person is outgoing, sociable, talkative, and comfortable meeting and talking to new people
Includes the characteristic of dominance
Likes to be in control and influence others
Self-confident, seeks positions of authority, and is competitive and assertive
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Big Five Personality Dimensions (slide 3 of 6)
Agreeableness: Degree to which a person is able to get along with others by being good-natured, cooperative, forgiving, compassionate, understanding, and trusting
Warm and approachable
More agreeable people are more likely to get and keep jobs
Overly agreeable people tend to be promoted less and earn less money
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Big Five Personality Dimensions (slide 4 of 6)
Conscientiousness: Degree to which a person is responsible, dependable, persistent, and achievement-oriented
Focus on a few goals
More important than extroversion for effective leadership
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Big Five Personality Dimensions (slide 5 of 6)
Emotional stability: Degree to which a person is well-adjusted, calm, and secure
Emotionally stable leader can:
Handle stress and criticism well and does not take mistakes or failures personally
Develop positive relationships
Improve relationships
Leaders with a low degree of emotional stability can become tense, anxious, or depressed
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Big Five Personality Dimensions (slide 6 of 6)
Openness to experience: Degree to which a person has a broad range of interests and is imaginative, creative, and willing to consider new ideas
Intellectually curious and seeks new experiences
Early travel and exposure to different ideas and culture are critical to development
Important because leadership is about change
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Locus of Control (slide 1 of 2)
Defines whether a person places the primary responsibility for what happens to him or her within himself/herself or on outside forces
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Locus of Control (slide 2 of 2)
High internal locus of control (internals)—Belief that actions determine what happens to them
High external locus of control (externals)—Belief that outside forces determine what happens to them
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 4.1 – Maximizing Leadership Effectiveness
Sources: Based on Patricia Wallington, ‘‘The Ins and Outs of Personality,’’ CIO (January 15, 2003), pp. 42, 44; ‘‘From the Front Lines: Leadership Strategies for Introverts,’’ Leader to Leader (Fall 2009), pp. 59–60; Joann S. Lublin, ‘‘Introverted Execs Find Ways to Shine,’’ The Wall Street Journal Asia (April 18, 2011), p. 31; and Ginka Toegel and Jean-Louis Barsoux, ‘‘How to Become a Better Leader,’’ MIT Sloan Management Review (Spring 2012), pp. 51–60.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Authoritarianism (slide 1 of 2)
The belief that power and status differences should exist in an organization
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Authoritarianism (slide 2 of 2)
Leader’s degree of authoritarianism affects how the leader wields and shares power
High authoritarianism
Traditional and rational approach to management
Autocratic style of leadership
Difference between leader and follower affects leader’s effectiveness
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Values
Fundamental beliefs that an individual considers to be important, that are relatively stable over time, and that have an impact on attitudes and behavior
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Instrumental and End Values
Instrumental values
Beliefs about the types of behavior that are appropriate for reaching goals
End values
Sometimes called terminal values, these are beliefs about the kind of goals or outcomes that are worth trying to pursue
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Values – Differences and Influence
Individuals differ in how they prioritize values
Identify and understand value differences to improve communication and effectiveness
Values are established by early adulthood but can change
For leaders, values influence how they:
Relate to others
Perceive opportunities, situations, and problems
Make decisions
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 4.2 – Differences in Leaders’ and Nonleaders’ Value Rankings
Source: Based on Table 2, Differences in Managers’ versus Non-Managers’ Terminal and Instrumental Value Ranking, in Edward F. Murphy Jr., Jane Whitney Gibson, and Regina A. Greenwood, ‘‘Analyzing Generational Values among Managers and Non-Managers for Sustainable Organizational Effectiveness,’’ SAM Advanced Management Journal (Winter 2010), pp. 33–55.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Attitude
An evaluation (either positive or negative) about people, events, or things
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Theory X and Theory Y
Theory X
Assumption that people are basically lazy and not motivated to work and that they have a natural tendency to avoid responsibility
Theory Y
Assumption that people do not inherently dislike work and will commit themselves willingly to work that they care about
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 4.3 – Attitudes and Assumptions of Theory X and Theory Y
Source: Based on Douglas McGregor, The Human Side of Enterprise (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960), pp. 33–48.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Perception
The process people use to make sense out of the environment by selecting, organizing, and interpreting information
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Perceptual Distortions (slide 1 of 2)
Perceptual defense
Errors in judgment that arise from inaccuracies in the perceptual process
Stereotyping
Tendency to assign an individual to a broad category and then attribute generalizations about the group to the individual
Halo effect
Overall impression of a person or situation based on one characteristic, either favorable or unfavorable
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Perceptual Distortions (slide 2 of 2)
Projection
Tendency to see one’s own personal traits in other people
Perceptual defense
Tendency to protect oneself by disregarding ideas, situations, or people that are unpleasant
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Attributions (slide 1 of 2)
Judgments about what caused a person’s behavior—either characteristics of the person or of the situation
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Attributions (slide 2 of 2)
Internal attribution—Characteristics of the person led to the behavior
External attribution—Situation caused the person’s behavior
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Fundamental Attribution Error
The tendency to underestimate the influence of external factors on another’s behavior and overestimate the influence of internal factors
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Self-Serving Bias
The tendency to overestimate the influence of internal factors on one’s successes and the influence of external factors on one’s failures
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Cognitive Style
How a person perceives, processes, interprets, and uses information
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Patterns of Thinking
Left hemisphere—Logical, analytical thinking and a linear approach to problem solving
Right hemisphere—Creative, intuitive, values-based thought processes
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Whole Brain Concept
An approach that considers not only a person’s preference for right-brained versus left-brained thinking, but also conceptual versus experiential thinking; identifies four quadrants of the brain related to different thinking styles
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 4.4 – Hermann’s Whole Brain Model
Source: Ned Herrmann, The Whole Brain Business Book (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996) p. 15.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)™ (slide 1 of 2)
Test that measures how individuals differ in gathering and evaluating information for solving problems and making decisions
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)™ (slide 2 of 2)
Uses different pairs of attributes to classify people in 1 of 16 different personality types
Introversion versus extroversion
Sensing versus intuition
Thinking versus feeling
Judging versus perceiving
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Guidelines for Working with Different Personality Types
Understand your own personality and how you react to others
Treat everyone with respect
Acknowledge each person’s strengths
Strive for understanding
Remember that everyone wants to fit in
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
image4.jpeg
image5.png
image6.png
image7.png
image8.png
,
CHAPTER 5
Leadership Mind and Emotion
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 1 of 2)
Recognize how mental models guide your behavior and relationships
Engage in independent thinking by staying mentally alert, thinking critically, and being mindful rather than mindless
Break out of categorized thinking patterns and open your mind to new ideas and multiple perspectives
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 2 of 2)
Begin to apply systems thinking and personal mastery to your activities at school or work
Exercise emotional intelligence, including being self-aware, managing your emotions, motivating yourself, displaying empathy, and managing relationships
Apply the difference between motivating others based on fear and motivating others based on love
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leading with Head and Heart
Whole leaders use both head and heart
Use their heads for organizational issues
Use their hearts for human issues
Current issues
How to give people a sense of meaning and purpose
How to make employees feel valued and respected
How to keep morale and motivation high
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Mental Models
Theories people hold about specific systems in the world and their expected behavior
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 5.1 – Elements of a System
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Systems and Mental Models
A system is any set of elements that interact to form a whole and produce a specified outcome
A mental model helps leaders attain the desired outcome by arranging the key elements in the systems
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 5.2 – Google Leaders’ Mental Model
Source: Based on Adam Lashinsky, ‘‘Chaos by Design,’’ Fortune (October 2, 2006), pp. 86–98.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Assumptions
Assumptions are part of a leader’s mental model about events, situations, circumstances, and people
Assumptions are dangerous if they are accepted as truth
Questioning assumptions can help leaders understand and shift their mental models
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Changing or Expanding Mental Models
Leader’s mindset is key in organization’s success
Greatest factor in success of leaders and organizations is the ability to change or expand one’s mental model
Organization is vulnerable if the leader’s mental model is obsolete
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Global Mindset
The ability of managers to appreciate and influence individuals, groups, organizations, and systems that represent different social, cultural, political, institutional, intellectual, or psychological characteristics
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Developing a Leader’s Mind
Independent Open-
Thinking Mindedness
Systems Personnel
Thinking Mastery
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Independent Thinking (slide 1 of 2)
Independent thinking
Questioning assumptions and interpreting data and events according to one’s own beliefs, ideas, and thinking, rather than preestablished rules or categories defined by others
Mindfulness
State of focused attention on the present moment and a readiness to create new mental categories in the face of evolving information and shifting circumstances
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Independent Thinking (slide 2 of 2)
Mindlessness
Questioning assumptions and interpreting data and events according to one’s own beliefs, ideas, and thinking, rather than preestablished rules or categories defined by others
Intellectual stimulation
Arousing followers’ thoughts and imaginations as well as stimulating their ability to identify and solve problems creatively
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Open-Mindedness
Pike Syndrome illustrates the power of conditioning that limits thinking and behavior
Openness
Putting aside preconceptions and suspending beliefs and opinions
Needed for learning
Referred to as beginner’s mind
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Systems Thinking (slide 1 of 2)
The ability to see the synergy of the whole rather than just the separate elements of a system and to learn to reinforce or change whole system patterns
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Systems Thinking (slide 2 of 2)
Relationship among the parts that form a system enables leaders to:
Look for patterns of movement over time
Focus on the factors that accomplish the performance of the whole
Discern circles of causality
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 5.3 – Systems Thinking and Circles of Causality
Source: Based on concepts presented in Peter M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (New York: Doubleday/Currency, 1990).
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Personal Mastery (slide 1 of 2)
The discipline of mastering yourself; it embodies clarity of mind, clarity of objectives, and organizing to achieve objectives
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Personal Mastery (slide 2 of 2)
Qualities of personal mastery
Clarity of mind—Commitment to the truth of the current reality
Clarity of objectives—Focus on the end result that provides motivation
Organizing to achieve objectives—Bridge the disparity between current reality and the vision of a better future
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Emotional Intelligence
A person’s abilities to perceive, identify, understand, and successfully manage emotions in self and others
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
What Are Emotions?
Leaders with a high emotional intelligence are more effective
Leaders should understand:
Range of emotions people have
How emotions manifest themselves
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 5.4 – Positive and Negative Emotions
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 5.5 – Emotional Intelligence and Earning Power
Source: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Lally School of Management and Technology, as reported in BusinessWeek Frontier (February 5, 2001), p. F4.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Why Are Emotions Important?
Emotions are contagious
Emotions influence performance
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 5.6 – Positive Leadership and Performance
Source: Based on ‘‘Success & the Team Climate,’’ Team Leadership Toolkit, Lindsay-Sherwin Company Web site, http://www.lindsaysherwin.co.uk/guide_team_leadership/html_team_development/1_success_and_team_climate.htm (accessed May 13, 2011).
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 5.7 – The Components of Emotional Intelligence
Source: Adapted from Richard E. Boyatzis and Daniel Goleman, The Emotional Competence Inventory—University Edition (Boston, MA: The Hay Group, 2001).
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leading with Love versus Leading with Fear
Leading with Love
Contemporary approach
More effective
Used when the organizational success depends on people’s:
Knowledge
Mind power
Commitment
Creativity
Enthusiasm
People feel emotionally connected
People perform to their real capabilities
Leading with Fear
Traditional approach
Powerful motivator
Used when the organizational success depends on people following orders
Drives people to other organizations
People do not perform to their real capabilities
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Fear in Organizations
Workers can fear failure, change, personal loss, judgement, and the boss
Fear creates avoidance behavior
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 5.8 – Indicators of Love versus Fear in Organizations
Source: Daniel Holden, ‘‘Team Development: A Search for Elegance,’’ Industrial Management (September–October 2007), pp. 20–25. Copyright © by Institute of Industrial Engineers.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Bringing Love to Work
Binds people for a shared purpose through positive forces
Attracts people to take risks, learn, grow, and move the organization forward
Love should be translated to action
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 5.9 – The Practical Aspects and Outcomes of Caring About Others
*These are the actual, unedited words called out by participants and written on a whiteboard during a seminar at which people were asked these two questions.
Source: Marilyn R. Zuckerman and Lewis J. Hatala, Incredibly American: Releasing the Heart of Quality. © 1992. American Society for Quality. Reprinted with permission from the authors.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Why Followers Respond to Love (slide 1 of 2)
Fear-based motivation
Motivation based on fear of losing a job
Love-based motivation
Motivation based on feeling valued in the job
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Why Followers Respond to Love (slide 2 of 2)
Meets unspoken employee needs
Hear and understand them
Disagree without making them wrong
Acknowledge the greatness within them
Remember to look for their loving intentions
Tell them the truth with compassion
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
image4.jpeg
image5.png
image6.png
image7.png
image8.png
image9.png
image10.png
image11.png
image12.png
image13.png
,
CHAPTER 2
Traits, Behaviors, and Relationships
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 1 of 3)
Outline some personal traits and characteristics that are associated with effective leaders
Identify your own traits that you can transform into strengths and bring to a leadership role
Distinguish among various roles leaders play in organizations, including operations roles, collaborative roles, and advisory roles, and where your strengths might best fit
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 2 of 3)
Recognize autocratic versus democratic leadership behavior and the impact of each
Know the distinction between people-oriented and task-oriented leadership behavior and when each should be used
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 3 of 3)
Understand how the theory of individualized leadership has broadened the understanding of relationships between leaders and followers.
Describe some key characteristics of entrepreneurial leaders
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Traits
The distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-confidence, and appearance
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Great Man Approach
A leadership perspective that sought to identify the inherited traits leaders possessed that distinguished them from people who were not leaders
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 2.1 – Some Leader Characteristics
Sources: Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Management Applications, 3rd ed. (New York: The Free Press, 1990), pp. 80–81; S. A. Kirkpatrick and E. A. Locke, ‘‘Leadership: Do Traits Matter?’’ Academy of Management Executive 5, no. 2 (1991), pp. 48–60; and James M. Kouzes and Barry Z. Posner, The Leadership Challenge: How to Get Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990).
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Characteristics of Leaders (slide 1 of 2)
Optimism
Tendency to see the positive side of things and expect that things will turn out well
Self-confidence
Assurance in one’s own judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities
Honesty
Truthfulness and nondeception
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Characteristics of Leaders (slide 2 of 2)
Integrity
Quality of being whole, integrated, and acting in accordance with solid ethical principles
Drive
High motivation that creates a high effort level by a leader
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Know Your Strengths
A leader does not need all of the skills to handle every problem
Interdependence is the key to success. Leaders should:
Hone their skills
Collaborate with others
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Strength
A natural talent or ability that has been supported and reinforced with learned knowledge and skills
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Matching Strengths with Roles (slide 1 of 3)
Operational role
Vertically oriented leadership role
Executive has direct control over people and resources
Uses position power to accomplish results
Leaders
Traditional line and general management positions
Focus on results
Self-confident and assertive
Analytical and knowledgeable
Translate knowledge into vision
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Matching Strengths with Roles (slide 2 of 3)
Collaborative role
Horizontal leadership role
Works behind the scenes and uses personal power to influence others and get things done
Leaders
Project managers, matrix managers, team leaders
People skills for networking and building relationships
Proactive and flexible
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Matching Strengths with Roles (slide 3 of 3)
Advisory role
Provides guidance and support
Responsible for developing broad organizational capabilities rather than accomplishing specific business results
Leaders
Legal, finance, and human resource departments
People skills
Ability to influence others
Honesty and integrity
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 2.2 – Three Types of Leadership Roles
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Behavior Approaches
Autocratic
Centralizes authority and derives power from position, control of rewards, and coercion
Effective when the skill difference between the leader and subordinates is high
Democratic
Delegates authority, encourages participation, relies on subordinates’ knowledge for completion of tasks, and depends on subordinate’s respect for influence
Effective if subordinates possess decision-making skills
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 2.3 – Leadership Continuum
Source: Harvard Business Review. An exhibit from Robert Tannenbaum and Warren Schmidt, ‘‘How to Choose a Leadership Pattern’’ (May–June 1973). Copyright 1973 by the president and Fellows of Harvard College.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Ohio State Studies
Developed and administered the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ) to employees
Resulted in two categories of leadership:
Consideration
Initiating structure
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Consideration
The extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Initiating Structure
The extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates’ work activities toward goal achievement
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
University of Michigan Studies
Employee-centered
Leadership behavior that displays a focus on the human needs of subordinates
Job-centered
Leadership behavior in which leaders direct activities toward efficiency, cost cutting, and scheduling with an emphasis on goals and work facilitation
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leadership Grid
A two-dimensional leadership model that describes major leadership styles based on measuring both concern for people and concern for production
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 2.4 – The Leadership Grid®
Source: The Leadership Grid figure from Leadership Dilemma—Grid Solutions by Robert R. Blake and Anne Adams McCanse (formerly the Managerial Grid by Robert R. Blake and Jane S. Mouton). Houston: Gulf Publishing Company, p. 29. Copyright 1991 by Scientific Methods, Inc. Reproduced by permission of the owners.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 2.5 – Themes of Leader Behavior Research
Sources: Based on Marilyn R. Zuckerman and Lewis J. Hatala, Incredibly American: Releasing the Heart of Quality (Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality, 1992), pp. 141–142; and Mark O’Connell, Gary Yukl, and Thomas Taber, ‘‘Leader Behavior and LMX: A Constructive Replication,’’ Journal of Managerial Psychology 27, no. 2 (2012), pp. 143–154.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Individualized Leadership
A theory based on the notion that a leader develops a unique relationship with each subordinate or group member, which determines how the leader behaves toward the member and how the member responds to the leader
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 2.6 – Stages of Development of Individualized Leadership
Sources: Based on Fred Danereau, ‘‘A Dyadic Approach to Leadership: Creating and Nurturing This Approach Under Fire,’’ Leadership Quarterly 6, no. 4 (1995), pp. 479–490, and George B. Graen and Mary Uhl-Bien, ‘‘Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level, Multi-Domain Approach,’’ Leadership Quarterly 6, no. 2 (1995), pp. 219–247.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Vertical Dyad Linkage (VDL) Model (slide 1 of 2)
A model of individualized leadership that argues for the importance of the dyad formed by a leader with each member of the group
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Vertical Dyad Linkage (VDL) Model (slide 2 of 2)
In-group relationship—Seen among members with whom leaders spend a disproportionate amount of time
Out-group relationship—Seen among members of the group who did not experience a sense of trust and extra consideration
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 2.7 – Leader Behavior toward In-Group versus Out-Group Members
Sources: Based on Jean François Manzoni and Jean-Louis Barsoux, ‘‘The Set-Up-to-Fail Syndrome,’’ Harvard Business Review (March–April 1988), pp. 110–113; and Mark O’Donnell, Gary Yukl, and Thomas Taber, ‘‘Leader Behavior and LMX: A Constructive Replication,’’ Journal of Management Psychology 27, no. 2 (2012), pp. 143–154.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) (slide 1 of 2)
Individualized leadership model that explores how leader–member relationships develop over time and how the quality of exchange relationships affects outcomes
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) (slide 2 of 2)
Leaders form high-quality relationships with all followers
Higher-quality relationship leads to better performance
Followers provide assistance for high performance and participate in and influence decisions
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Entrepreneurial Traits and Behaviors
Entrepreneurship
Initiating a business venture, organizing the necessary resources, and assuming the associated risks and rewards
Four important characteristics:
Vision and dissatisfaction with the present
Ability to get people on board
Flexibility, openness to feedback, and ability to learn and adapt
Persistence and execution
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
image4.jpeg
image5.png
image6.png
image7.png
image8.png
image9.png
image10.png
image11.png
,
CHAPTER 1
What Does It Mean to Be a Leader?
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 1 of 3)
Understand the full meaning of leadership and see the leadership potential in yourself and others
Recognize and facilitate the six fundamental transformations in today’s organizations and leaders
Identify the primary reasons for leadership derailment and the new paradigm skills that can help you avoid it
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 2 of 3)
Recognize the traditional functions of management and the fundamental differences between leadership and management
Appreciate the crucial importance of providing direction, alignment, relationships, personal qualities, and outcomes
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 3 of 3)
Explain how leadership has evolved and how historical approaches apply to the practice of leadership today
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leadership
An influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that reflect their shared purposes
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 1.1 – What Leadership Involves
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leadership (slide 1 of 2)
Influence
Relationship among people is not passive
Multidirectional
Noncoercive
Reciprocal
People want substantive changes
Qualities required for effective leadership are also needed to be an effective follower
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leadership (slide 2 of 2)
Leaders must have followers
Effective followers
Think for themselves
Carry out assignments with energy and enthusiasm
Leadership is shared among leaders and followers
Everyone should be fully engaged
Everyone should accept higher levels of responsibility
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Paradigm
A shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the world
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 1.2 – The New Reality for Leaders
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Management and Vision
Management
Attainment of organizational goals in an effective and efficient manner through:
Planning and organizing
Staffing and directing
Controlling organizational resources
Vision
Picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 1.3 – Comparing Management and Leadership
Sources: Based on John P. Kotter, A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management (New York: The Free Press, 1990) and ideas in Kevin Cashman, ‘‘Lead with Energy,’’ Leadership Excellence (December 2010), p. 7; Henry Mintzberg, Managing (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2009); and Mike Maddock, ‘‘The One Talent That Makes Good Leaders Great,’’ Forbes (September 26, 2012), www.forbes.com/sites/mikemaddock/2012/09/26/the-one-talent-that-makes-good-leaders-great/ (accessed March 7, 2013).
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Historical Theories of Leadership (slide 1 of 3)
Great man theories
Leadership was conceptualized as a single “Great Man” who put everything together and influenced others to follow along based on the strength of inherited traits, qualities, and abilities
Trait theories
Picture of an ambitious, desirable future for the organization or team
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Historical Theories of Leadership (slide 2 of 3)
Behavior theories
Leaders’ behavior toward followers correlated with leadership effectiveness or ineffectiveness
Contingency theories
Leaders can analyze their situation and tailor their behavior to improve leadership effectiveness
Also known as situational theories
Leadership cannot be understood in a vacuum separate from various elements of the group or organizational situation
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Historical Theories of Leadership (slide 3 of 3)
Influence theories
Examine the influence processes between leaders and followers
Charismatic leadership—Influence based on the qualities and charismatic personality of the leader
Relational theories
Focus on how leaders and followers interact and influence one another
Transformational leadership and servant leadership are two important relational theories
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 1.4 – Leadership Evolution
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Agile Leadership
Giving up control in the traditional sense and encouraging the growth and development of others to ensure organizational flexibility and responsiveness
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Derailment
A phenomenon in which a manager with an impressive track record reaches a certain level but goes off track and can’t advance because of a mismatch between job needs and personal skills and qualities
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 1.5 – Five Fatal Flaws That Cause Derailment
Source: Based on Yi Zhang, Jean Brittain Leslie, and Kelly M. Hannum, ‘‘Trouble Ahead: Derailment Is Alive and Well,’’ Thunderbird International Business Review 55, no. 1 (January–February 2013), pp. 95–102.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 1.6 – Learning to Be a Leader
Source: Based on ‘‘Guidelines for the Apprentice Leader,’’ in Robert J. Allio, ‘‘Masterclass: Leaders and Leadership—Many Theories, But What Advice Is Reliable?’’ Strategy & Leadership 41, no. 1 (2013), pp. 4–14.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 1.7 – Framework for the Book
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
image4.jpeg
image5.png
image6.png
image7.png
image8.png
image9.png
image10.png
image11.png
,
CHAPTER 3
Contingency Approaches to Leadership
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 1 of 2)
Understand how leadership is often contingent on people and situations
Apply Hersey and Blanchard’s situational theory of leader style to the level of follower readiness
Apply Fiedler’s contingency model to key relationships among leader style, situational favorability, and group task performance
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Learning Objectives (slide 2 of 2)
Explain the path–goal theory of leadership
Use the Vroom–Jago model to identify the correct amount of follower participation in specific decision situations
Know how to use the power of situational variables to substitute for or neutralize the need for leadership
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Contingency and Contingency Approaches
Contingency
Theory meaning one thing depends on other things
Contingency approaches
Approaches that seek to delineate the characteristics of situations and followers and examine the leadership styles that can be used effectively
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 3.1 – Comparing the Universalistic and Contingency Approaches to Leadership
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 3.2 – Meta-Categories of Leader Behavior and Four Leader Styles
Sources: Based on Gary Yukl, Angela Gordon, and Tom Taber, ‘‘A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Leadership Behavior: Integrating a Half Century of Behavior Research,’’ Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies 9, no. 1 (2002), pp. 15–32 and Gary Yukl, ‘‘Effective Leadership Behavior: What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,’’ Academy of Management Perspectives (November 2012), pp. 66–81.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Situational Theory
Hersey and Blanchard’s extension of the Leadership Grid focusing on the characteristics of followers as the important element of the situation, and consequently, of determining effective leader behavior
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Theory—Leader Style
Telling style
Directive approach that reflects a high concern for tasks and a low concern for people and relationships
Selling style
Based on a high concern for both relationships and tasks
Participating style
Characterized by high relationship and low task behavior
Delegating style
Reflects a low concern for both tasks and relationships
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 3.3 – The Situational Model of Leadership
Source: Adapted from The Hersey and Blanchard Situational Leadership Model / The Center for Leadership Studies, Inc.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Theory—Follower Readiness
Low readiness
Use the telling leader style
Moderate readiness
Use the selling leader style
High readiness
Use the participating leader style
Very high readiness
Use the delegating leader style
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Fiedler’s Contingency Model
A model designed to diagnose whether a leader is task-oriented or relationship-oriented and match leader style to the situation
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Fiedler’s Contingency Model— Leadership Styles
Relationship-oriented leadership
Concerned with people
Establishes mutual trust and respect
Listens to employees’ needs
Task-oriented leadership
Motivated by task accomplishment
Provides clear direction and performance standards
Measure with a least preferred coworker (LPC) scale
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Situation
Leader–member relations
Group atmosphere and members’ attitudes toward and acceptance of the leader
Task structure
Extent to which tasks performed by the group are defined, involve specific procedures, and have clear, explicit goals
Position power
Extent to which the leader has formal authority over subordinates
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 3.4 – Fiedler’s Classification: How Leader Style Fits the Situation
Source: Based on Fred E. Fiedler, “The Effects of Leadership Training and Experience: A Contingency Model Interpretation,” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1972), p. 455.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Path–Goal Theory
A contingency approach to leadership in which the leader’s responsibility is to increase subordinates’ motivation by clarifying the behaviors necessary for task accomplishment and rewards
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 3.5 – Leader Roles in the Path–Goal Model
Source: Reprinted from Organizational Dynamics, 13 (Winter 1985), Bernard M. Bass, “Leadership: Good, Better, Best,” pp. 26–40, Copyright 1985, with permission from Elsevier.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leader Behavior (slide 1 of 2)
Supportive leadership
Shows concern for subordinates’ well-being and personal needs
Leader’s behavior is open, friendly, and approachable, and the leader creates a team climate and treats subordinates as equals
Directive leadership
Tells subordinates exactly what they are supposed to do
Leader behavior includes planning, making schedules, setting performance goals and behavior standards, and stressing adherence to rules and regulations
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Leader Behavior (slide 2 of 2)
Participative leadership
Consults with subordinates about decisions
Leader behavior includes asking for opinions and suggestions, encouraging participation in decision making, and meeting with subordinates in their workplaces
Achievement-oriented leadership
Sets clear and challenging goals for subordinates
Leader behavior stresses high-quality performance and improvement over current performance
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Situational Contingencies
Personal characteristics of group members
Ability and skills
Needs and motivations
Work environment
Degree of task structure
Nature of the formal authority system
Work group itself
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 3.6 – Path–Goal Situations and Preferred Leader Behaviors
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
The Vroom–Jago Contingency Model (slide 1 of 2)
A contingency model that focuses on varying degrees of participative leadership and how each level of participation influences the quality and accountability of decisions
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
The Vroom–Jago Contingency Model (slide 2 of 2)
Situational factors shape the likelihood that either a participative or autocratic approach will produce the best outcome
Tells the leader precisely the correct amount of participation by subordinates to use in making a particular decision
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 3.7 – Five Leader Decision Styles
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Diagnostic Questions (slide 1 of 2)
Decision significance
How significant is this decision for the project or organization?
Importance of commitment
How important is subordinate commitment to carrying out the decision?
Leader expertise
What is the level of the leader’s expertise in relation to the problem?
Likelihood of commitment
If the leader were to make the decision alone, would subordinates have high or low commitment to the decision?
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Diagnostic Questions (slide 2 of 2)
Group support for goals
What is the degree of subordinate support for the team’s or organization’s objectives at stake in this decision?
Goal expertise
What is the level of group members’ knowledge and expertise in relation to the problem?
Team competence
How skilled and committed are group members to working together as a team to solve problems?
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Selecting a Decision Style
Timesaving-based model
Use when a decision has to be made immediately
Development-based model
Use when it is important to develop the thinking and decision-making skills of followers
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 3.8 – Timesaving-Based Model
Source: Reprinted from Organizational Dynamics, 28, no. 4, Victor H. Vroom, ‘‘Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,’’ pp. 82–94, Copyright 2000, with permission from Elsevier.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 3.9 – Employee Development-Based Model
Source: Victor H. Vroom, ‘‘Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,’’ Organizational Dynamics 28, no. 4 (Spring 2000), pp. 82–94. This is Vroom’s adaptation of Tannenbaum and Schmidt’s Taxonomy.
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Substitutes for Leadership
Substitute
Situational variable that makes leadership unnecessary or redundant
Neutralizer
Situational characteristic that counteracts the leadership style and prevents the leader from displaying certain behaviors
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Exhibit 3.10 – Substitutes and Neutralizers for Leadership
©2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

